好消息,美國對華卡客車雙反案中國勝訴
其實(shí),在此之前的2017年2月14日,美國商務(wù)部發(fā)布通知,調(diào)低雙錢輪胎和貴州輪胎的反補(bǔ)貼稅率。其中,雙錢輪胎的反補(bǔ)貼稅率,由此前確認(rèn)的38.61%降低至20.98%;貴州輪胎的反補(bǔ)貼稅率,由此前確認(rèn)的65.46%降低至63.34%。
該決議稱,中國的輪胎制造商指正得很對,美國商務(wù)部在計(jì)算稅率的時候,犯了一些錯誤。此外,美國商務(wù)部還調(diào)整了其他輪胎企業(yè)的平均補(bǔ)貼稅率,從此前的52.04%降低至42.16%。
2017年1月23日,美國商務(wù)部公布對中國輪胎反傾銷和反補(bǔ)貼終裁結(jié)果,認(rèn)定從中國進(jìn)口的卡客車輪胎存在傾銷行為,并且獲得“可采取反補(bǔ)貼措施的補(bǔ)貼”。當(dāng)時,美方公布的補(bǔ)貼幅度為38.61%至65.46%。隨后,雙錢輪胎和貴州輪胎對美國商務(wù)部進(jìn)行指控,稱其在反補(bǔ)貼稅率上的計(jì)算存在嚴(yán)重錯誤。
以下為全文:
WASHINGTON (Feb. 22, 2017) — By a 3-2 vote, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has made a negative determination on whether the domestic truck and bus tire industry has sufferedMATerial injury beCAuse of Chinese imports.
The ITC vote means that the U.S. Department of Commerce will not order U.S. Customs and Border Protection to collect antidumping and countervailing duties from Chinese truck and bus tire manufacturers and importers.
ITC Vice Chairman David B. Johanson and Commissioners Meredith M. BroADBEnt and F. Scott Kieff voted against a finding of material injury, whereas Chairman Rhonda K. Schmidtlein and Commissioner Irving A. Williamson voted in the affirmative. Commissioner Dean A. PiNKErt did not participate in the vote.
The United Steelworkers union petitioned the ITC in January 2016, requesting antidumping and countervailing duty relief protection from Chinese truck and bus tire imports under Sections 701 and 731 of the Trade Act.
The ITC made a preliminary determination of material injury in March, and the Commerce Department issued final antidumping duties against Chinese tire makers ranging from 9 to 22.57 percent on Jan. 23.
On the same day, Commerce levied final countervailing duties ranging from 38.61 to 65.46 percent. On Feb. 14, after reviewing its calculations, the agency lowered the countervailing duties against Double Coin HoldinGS Ltd. to 20.98 from 38.61 percent. The duties against Guizhou Tyre Co. Ltd. were lowered slightly, to 63.34 from 65.46 percent.
Cooper Tire &Rubber Co., which manufactures all its truck and bus tires in China, approved the decision.
“Cooper supports free and fair trade, and we are pleased with the ITC’s determination,” the tire maker said.
Walter Weller, senior vice president, strategic accounts at China Manufacturers Alliance L.L.C. (CMA), also said he was pleased with the ITC’s decision. CMA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Double Coin and the domestic DIStributor of Double Coin tires.
“Anybody considering all the facts, including the record profits for American manufacturers and their inability to even come close to satisfying domestic truck and bus tire demand, would have to conclude that this was the right thing to do,” Mr. Weller said.
USW International President Leo W. Gerard condemned the decision.
“The ITC commissioners made a huge mistake,” Mr. Gerard said in a press release. “While the Department of Commerce identified subsidies of up to more than 60 percent and dumping of up to almost 23 percent, the ITC failed to support relief for the injured workers.
“That simply ignores the facts and the harm that Chinese unfairly traded exports have caused the workers,” he said.
Other recent USW petitions to the ITC met with more success.
In July 2015, the ITC voted 3-3 to find that Chinese passenger and light truck tire imports were causing material injury to the U.S. passenger and light truck tire industry. Commerce assessed countervailing duties ranging from 20.73 to 100.77 percent, and antidumping duties of 14.35 to 87.99 percent.
On Feb. 3, the ITC voted 5-0 to find that Indian and Sri Lankan off-the-road tire imports were causing material injury to the U.S. OTR tire industry.
The USW and Titan Tire Corp. were the petitioners. Countervailing duties levied in that case ranged from 2.18 to 5.38 percent. No antidumping duties were levied.
The ITC’s report on the Chinese truck and bus tire investigation will be posted online by March 15.
1、凡本網(wǎng)注明“來源:cpehywm.cn” 的所有作品,版權(quán)均屬于客車網(wǎng),未經(jīng)本網(wǎng)授權(quán),任何單位及個人不得轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編或以其它方式使用上述作品。已經(jīng)本網(wǎng)授權(quán)使用作品的,應(yīng)在授權(quán)范圍內(nèi)使用,并注明“來源:cpehywm.cn”。違反上述聲明者,本網(wǎng)將追究其相關(guān)法律責(zé)任。
2、凡本網(wǎng)注明 “來源:XXX(非客車網(wǎng))” 的作品,均轉(zhuǎn)載自其它媒體,轉(zhuǎn)載目的在于傳遞更多信息,并不代表本網(wǎng)贊同其觀點(diǎn)和對其真實(shí)性負(fù)責(zé)。
3、如因作品內(nèi)容、版權(quán)和其它問題需要同本網(wǎng)聯(lián)系的,請?jiān)?0日內(nèi)進(jìn)行。
※ 有關(guān)作品版權(quán)事宜請聯(lián)系:copyright#chinabuses.com
- 陳華出任康明斯中國供應(yīng)鏈、質(zhì)量和信息技術(shù)執(zhí)行總監(jiān)[09-26]
- 成都客車森鵬電子共攜手 繪制海外綠色交通新篇章[09-26]
- 逐鹿歐美市場 精進(jìn)電動耀動2024漢諾威商用車展[09-26]
- 玉柴參加“與中國駐東盟經(jīng)商參贊面對面”交流會[09-26]
- 北京祥龍公司與寧德時代簽署戰(zhàn)略合作協(xié)議[09-26]
- 媒體關(guān)注:從未勢能源看中國氫能企業(yè)的全球化之路[09-25]
- 盡顯“全天候”品質(zhì) 歐輝BJ6105確實(shí)有點(diǎn)大不同 [09-25]
- 森鵬出海 領(lǐng)航商用車數(shù)智化轉(zhuǎn)型[09-23]